Part of The Respect Index family · The Hiring Index ↗

Industry

Clean Energy: layoffs and severance

33 Clean Energy companies are tracked on The Separation Index. Company scores come from reports by people who were separated from them.

Severance across Clean Energy

0 of 5 reports needed to show a severance figure for Clean Energy

An industry figure also needs reports from at least 3different companies, so one employer’s experience is never published as an industry norm.

Clean Energy companies

Alliant EnergyNo score yetAmerenNo score yetAPA CorporationNo score yetAtmos EnergyNo score yetChevron CorporationNo score yetCMS EnergyNo score yetConsolidated EdisonNo score yetDevon EnergyNo score yetDiamondback EnergyNo score yetDominion EnergyNo score yetDTE EnergyNo score yetDuke EnergyNo score yetEdison InternationalNo score yetEntergyNo score yetEQT CorporationNo score yetEvergyNo score yetExelonNo score yetJetNo score yetJetNo score yetMarathon PetroleumNo score yetNextEra EnergyNo score yetOneokNo score yetOpenTableNo score yetPG&E CorporationNo score yetPinnacle West CapitalNo score yetPPL CorporationNo score yetSchlumbergerNo score yetSempraNo score yetTarga ResourcesNo score yetTexas Pacific Land CorporationNo score yetVistra Corp.No score yetWEC Energy GroupNo score yetWilliams CompaniesNo score yet

A company shows “No score yet” until 5 credible reports exist for it. A score computed from fewer is held back rather than shown — the same floor its own company page uses.

What these numbers are, and what they are not

Every figure on this page is built from reports by people who were separated from companies classified as Clean Energy. It describes the reports we received, not the industry. People who had a bad separation have more reason to file one, so treat this as what was reported, not as a measured rate across Clean Energy employers.

A company’s score, or its absence, is not a recommendation about working there and not a judgement of the company. Scores move as reports arrive, a company with no score simply has too few reports to publish one, and nothing here is legal advice.